<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Formal and Informal Coaching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/</link>
	<description>inspiring creative professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-265982</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGuinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-265982</guid>
		<description>Heh, you&#039;ve probably guessed by now that my writing is not legally watertight. :-)  

Look forward to seeing you around the site in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, you&#8217;ve probably guessed by now that my writing is not legally watertight. <img src='http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>Look forward to seeing you around the site in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick J. Fontana</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-265002</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick J. Fontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-265002</guid>
		<description>In case you didn&#039;t notice, that picture is not really me. It&#039;s a picture of Raymond Burr in his Perry Mason role. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you didn&#8217;t notice, that picture is not really me. It&#8217;s a picture of Raymond Burr in his Perry Mason role. <img src='http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick J. Fontana</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-265000</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick J. Fontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-265000</guid>
		<description>Hi, Mark.

It&#039;s funny, I&#039;m an attorney and in all the legal documents, we use &quot;he&quot; and &quot;him.&quot;

Then, at the end of the document, we have a standard clause that reads, &quot;Use of the masculine gender herein shall be deemed to  include the feminine gender and use of the singular shall also include the plural, whenever the context herein so requires.&quot;

Haha. Reading that now, it sounds funny, but that&#039;s how we do it. So we use &quot;he&quot; and then qualify it, but I understand you can&#039;t do that in &quot;normal&quot; writing. ;)

I will check out more of your articles here. I enjoy this site.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mark.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, I&#8217;m an attorney and in all the legal documents, we use &#8220;he&#8221; and &#8220;him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then, at the end of the document, we have a standard clause that reads, &#8220;Use of the masculine gender herein shall be deemed to  include the feminine gender and use of the singular shall also include the plural, whenever the context herein so requires.&#8221;</p>
<p>Haha. Reading that now, it sounds funny, but that&#8217;s how we do it. So we use &#8220;he&#8221; and then qualify it, but I understand you can&#8217;t do that in &#8220;normal&#8221; writing. <img src='http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I will check out more of your articles here. I enjoy this site.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-264974</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGuinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-264974</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dominic. I appreciate your intention. I&#039;m not a big fan of s/he, nor alternating &#039;he&#039; and &#039;she&#039;, nor using &#039;he&#039; for both genders. It&#039;s one of those cases where you&#039;re damned if you do, damned if you don&#039;t. 

And I can&#039;t really imagine Americans saying &#039;one&#039; either. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dominic. I appreciate your intention. I&#8217;m not a big fan of s/he, nor alternating &#8216;he&#8217; and &#8217;she&#8217;, nor using &#8216;he&#8217; for both genders. It&#8217;s one of those cases where you&#8217;re damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t really imagine Americans saying &#8216;one&#8217; either. <img src='http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick J. Fontana</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-264754</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick J. Fontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-264754</guid>
		<description>Hi, Mark.

&gt;&gt;&gt; I agree that there isn’t an elegant solution to the problem. ‘One’ was pretty good, but one can’t use it these days without sounding like Prince Charles. &lt;&lt;&lt;

Haha. That&#039;s funny. :)

I never thought of it, but using the term &quot;One&quot; was never really popular in America, but I could see how it would be in England. The only reason I left my initial comment was that I enjoyed your article and love your writing style. but found the &quot;s/he&quot; term to be awkward.

Yes, some people do that here in America too, but mot everyone does and I don&#039;t like to do it. It&#039;s a pet peeve of mine. You are right that language changes with society, but I have resisted this change.

By the way, I&#039;m in New York.

Happy writing. 

Dominick J. Fontana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mark.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; I agree that there isn’t an elegant solution to the problem. ‘One’ was pretty good, but one can’t use it these days without sounding like Prince Charles. &lt;&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Haha. That&#039;s funny. <img src='http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I never thought of it, but using the term &quot;One&quot; was never really popular in America, but I could see how it would be in England. The only reason I left my initial comment was that I enjoyed your article and love your writing style. but found the &quot;s/he&quot; term to be awkward.</p>
<p>Yes, some people do that here in America too, but mot everyone does and I don&#039;t like to do it. It&#039;s a pet peeve of mine. You are right that language changes with society, but I have resisted this change.</p>
<p>By the way, I&#039;m in New York.</p>
<p>Happy writing. </p>
<p>Dominick J. Fontana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-264725</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGuinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-264725</guid>
		<description>My point was that it &lt;em&gt;used&lt;/em&gt; to be acceptable to use the masculine prononoun indiscriminately for both genders, but it isn&#039;t any more. Language changes with society.

&quot;the English language... lacks a gender-neutral pronoun for a person&quot; - no, it doesn&#039;t. The gender-neutral pronoun is &#039;one&#039;, but it&#039;s fallen out of use and now sounds old-fashioned (like the use of &#039;he&#039; for both genders).

I agree that there isn&#039;t an elegant solution to the problem. &#039;One&#039; was pretty good, but one can&#039;t use it these days without sounding like Prince Charles.

No, I&#039;m not American, but I&#039;ve checked with some American friends who tell me the situation is basically the same in their part of the States. Maybe not in yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point was that it <em>used</em> to be acceptable to use the masculine prononoun indiscriminately for both genders, but it isn&#8217;t any more. Language changes with society.</p>
<p>&#8220;the English language&#8230; lacks a gender-neutral pronoun for a person&#8221; &#8211; no, it doesn&#8217;t. The gender-neutral pronoun is &#8216;one&#8217;, but it&#8217;s fallen out of use and now sounds old-fashioned (like the use of &#8216;he&#8217; for both genders).</p>
<p>I agree that there isn&#8217;t an elegant solution to the problem. &#8216;One&#8217; was pretty good, but one can&#8217;t use it these days without sounding like Prince Charles.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not American, but I&#8217;ve checked with some American friends who tell me the situation is basically the same in their part of the States. Maybe not in yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick J. Fontana</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-263648</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick J. Fontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-263648</guid>
		<description>Oops; Freudian slip. In the last sentence of my prior message, I meant to write &quot;politically correct.&quot; Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops; Freudian slip. In the last sentence of my prior message, I meant to write &#8220;politically correct.&#8221; Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick J. Fontana</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-263647</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick J. Fontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-263647</guid>
		<description>You wrote: &quot;I would find another teacher if I were you. &quot;

I don&#039;t know; maybe you&#039;re not American, but it&#039;s basically common knowledge in America that everyone was taught that way from grammar school on. When the gender is unknown, the masculine pronoun is used to refer to both genders. So using &quot;he&quot; refers to both he and she. There&#039;s no need to awkwardly write them both out, beacuse it&#039;s inferred.

If you&#039;re doing it to be politically incorrect, that&#039;s another matter, but it&#039;s grammatically unnecessary.

Thank you.

Dominick J. Fontana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote: &#8220;I would find another teacher if I were you. &#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know; maybe you&#8217;re not American, but it&#8217;s basically common knowledge in America that everyone was taught that way from grammar school on. When the gender is unknown, the masculine pronoun is used to refer to both genders. So using &#8220;he&#8221; refers to both he and she. There&#8217;s no need to awkwardly write them both out, beacuse it&#8217;s inferred.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re doing it to be politically incorrect, that&#8217;s another matter, but it&#8217;s grammatically unnecessary.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>Dominick J. Fontana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-235137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGuinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-235137</guid>
		<description>&quot;I guess it doesn&#039;t really matter what style you use, formal or informal&quot; - yep, the results are what count!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I guess it doesn&#8217;t really matter what style you use, formal or informal&#8221; &#8211; yep, the results are what count!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making The Best Better Team</title>
		<link>http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-235066</link>
		<dc:creator>Making The Best Better Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/blog/2008/01/28/formal-and-informal-coaching/#comment-235066</guid>
		<description>Interesting...I guess it doesn&#039;t really matter what style you use, formal or informal, as long as you achieve your objectives and see the resulting improvements of coaching in your daily life. 

And also remember that success is not by chance, it&#039;s by choice so better choose to be a success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;I guess it doesn&#8217;t really matter what style you use, formal or informal, as long as you achieve your objectives and see the resulting improvements of coaching in your daily life. </p>
<p>And also remember that success is not by chance, it&#8217;s by choice so better choose to be a success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
